Blog

Case Study: SIL Design

Posted by Dustin Smith, P.E. on Dec 2, 2017 6:05:00 PM

The Opportunity:

As part of a relief valve study, a competing engineering firm recommended a major United States refinery to replace multiple relief valves and modify the associated piping on a column system in order to mitigate for a higher flare load. The proposed changes would have cost the refinery approximately $300,000. Unsure of the recommendations and associated expenses, the refinery reached out to Smith & Burgess to review the EPC’s findings.

Read More

Topics: Case Study, Refinery, Pressure Relief Valves, PRV Study, Overly Conservative Assumptions, Third Party Review, SIL Design, SIS Design

Case Study: Third Party Relief Valve Mitigation Review

Posted by Dustin Smith, P.E. on Nov 1, 2017 6:03:00 PM

The Opportunity:

A major US refinery used a competing engineering contractor to perform a flare and relief systems analysis. Upon completion of the project, the refinery was left with a list of facility upgrades that management deemed excessive. Smith & Burgess was hired to review the relief and flare systems documentation and provide engineering solutions that met corporate and industry requirements.

Read More

Topics: Case Study, Pressure Relief Valves, PRV Study, Third Party Review, Engineering Review, Relief Systems, PRV, Relief System Design, Refinery, Overly Conservative Assumptions, Relief Valve Mitigation, Flare Mitigation, Mitigation, Action Item Resolution, Relief Systems Revalidation

Case Study: Facility Siting

Posted by Dustin Smith, P.E. on Sep 8, 2017 6:06:00 PM

The Opportunity:

A major United States refinery was recommended to spend $2 Million on a temporary blast proof tent during turnaround from a facility siting study conducted by a third-party contractor.

Read More

Topics: Case Study, Engineering Review, Engineering Analysis, Refinery, Third Party Review, Overly Conservative Assumptions, RAGAGEP, Facility Siting

Case Study: Flare System Optimization I

Posted by Dustin Smith, P.E. on Feb 4, 2017 6:09:00 PM

The Opportunity:

A major United States refinery worked with an EPC on the site’s action items where they recommended a new flare worth approximately $30 Million. The refinery wanted a third-party review on the EPC’s recommendation and hired Smith & Burgess to verify their results.

Read More

Topics: Case Study, Flare Study, Refinery, Flare System, Flare Load Optimization, Flare Optimization, Overly Conservative Assumptions, Flare Revalidation, Heat and Material Balance, Action Item Resolution, Third Party Review

Case Study: Flare System Optimization II

Posted by Dustin Smith, P.E. on Aug 9, 2016 6:07:00 PM

The Opportunity:

A major United States refinery was recommended by an EPC to install a new flare worth approximately $60 Million. Unsatisfied with the EPC's recommendations, the refinery asked Smith & Burgess to perform a third-party review to verify their results.

Read More

Topics: Case Study, Flare Study, Flare System, Flare Management, Engineering Review, Flare Analysis, Flare Mitigation, Flare Optimization, Engineering Analysis, Refinery, Third Party Review, Overly Conservative Assumptions, Flare Revalidation

 Safety Knowledge Should be Share...

“It should not be necessary for each generation to rediscover the principles of process safety which the generation before discovered. We must learn from the experience of others rather than learn the hard way. We must pass on to the next generation a record of what we have learned.” - Jesse C. Ducommun, Safety Pioneer
 
As Process Safety engineers and consultants, we believe our unique position creates a responsibility for Smith & Burgess to share our years of accumulated safety knowledge.


>>> Keep up-to-date with our latest Process Safety knowledge, research, and content by subscribing below. >>>

Subscribe Here!

Recent Posts

Post By Topic

See all